Wo-man

https://8020japanese.com/particle-wo/ The satanic brotherhood/sisterhood created these two words, man and woman. were it man-wo, it would be actions that were done to the man. The reasoning of the marginal is then that, if it is put on the front then it will mean action from the man to the person who has this label, so that the female is that who is passive, the male does things to the female. In this case, the female is the puppet of the man, the man is her puppeteer. https://www.thehistoryofenglish.com/english-history-timeline - '55 BC First Roman raids on Britain under Julius Caesar 43 AD Roman occupation of Britain under Emperor Claudius (beginning of Roman rule of Britain) 410-436 Roman withdrawal from Britain c.450 Anglo-Saxon settlement (Angles, Frisians, Saxons, Jutes) of Britain begins

https://www.thoughtco.com/events-history-of-the-english-language-1692746 - '43—The Romans invade Britain, beginning 400 years of control over much of the island. 410—The Goths (speakers of a now-extinct East Germanic language) sack Rome. The first Germanic tribes arrive in Britain. Early 5th century—The Roman Empire collapsed and the Romans withdrew from Britain. The Picts and Scots from Ireland attack the Britons. Angles, Saxons, and other German settlers arrive in Britain to assist the Britons and claim territory.'

Co-pilot: 'The words "man" and "woman" have deep roots in the Old English language, evolving over centuries:

- "Man" originally came from Proto-Germanic "mann", meaning "person"—it was gender-neutral and referred to both men and women. Over time, it narrowed to mean male humans, especially after the Norman Conquest (1066).

- "Woman" evolved from Old English "wīfmann", meaning "female human" (wīf = woman/wife, mann = person). The word gradually changed to "wimman", then "wumman", and finally "woman".

Interestingly, the original Old English word for "man" in the male sense was "wer", which survives in words like "werewolf" (literally "man-wolf"). Would you like to explore how these words influenced other languages or societal perceptions?'

Back to the satanic reinvention of meaning for the word ‘man’, man is then a person, gender not implied. Wo-man is one of the targets of the actions of the man/person, so that I am not a person, only he is. I am the same as a puppet. We are sure the first time the satanic brotherhood/sisterhood messed up with the Romans was when they got those 100 to be sent to Judea with a mandatory stop in Syria. The Roman Empire members/officers then all got murdered and replaced with the satanic brotherhood members in Syria, as said before and confirmed by the devil. Co-pilot: 'The Romans invaded Judea in 63 BCE, bringing the region under Roman control. This marked the beginning of Roman rule, though they initially governed through local leaders like Herod the Great. Later, direct Roman governance led to tensions, culminating in the Jewish Revolt (66–73 CE) and the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 CE.' They stayed quiet there until the martyrdom and murder of Our Lord Jesus Christ. After that, they act to postpone the coming of the Romans to Judea. The Romans then come and take over while being handled/puppeteered by the Jews. The Jews do not invade lands or attack other peoples, only victimizing the own Jews, so that it was all quiet for a time. We then tend to think the the second source is the right one and it was 43 AD when a new group of Romans was usurped by the negro satanic brotherhood after those used the same method they used before to puppeteer the Romans so that they would, this time, move towards England.

chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://unipub.uni-graz.at/obvugrhs/content/titleinfo/213019/full.pdf THE HISTORY & FUTURE OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE – INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL FACTORS DIPLOMARBEIT zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades einer Magistra der Philosophie an der Geisteswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz vorgelegt von Michaela EHMANN am Institut für Anglistik Begutachterin: Ao. Univ.-Prof. Dr. phil. Annemarie Peltzer-Karpf Graz, 2011 - 'The British Isles have been populated for at least 50,000 years, (cf. Gelderen 2006: 1) nevertheless, English was not spoken until the Germanic tribes, “the founders of the English nation”, (Baugh and Cable 2006: 47) landed on the island in 449. (cf. Gelderen 2006: 1-2).' In this case, we know English started being spoken only after 449 AD in England. Who brought it to there was then the Germanic tribes. In this case, man came from German, as we can see on p. 14 of this source. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/An_Etymological_Dictionary_of_the_German_Language/Annotated/Mann confirms that the meaning of mann in German is the same, so person. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307445506_Testing_the_suffixoidization_of_German_-mann_'-man' confirms, that mann in German is person. We guessed and the satanic gave us the memory glimpse: there 'Braganca'/the devil explains that the satanic brotherhood/sisterhood invaded England and found out that the language there, English, had called man the male and that meant person. That from there their Islamic thoughts emerged: what happens is that these men invade places of people they have nothing in common with, being actually most different, as we have already explained, the skin color is for real an indicator from heavens. They speak to no local because they never know the local language and everyone where they go is white. That being already because they say they like eating us. They then, despising effort, so study and work, eventually pass the eyes over something and get stuck on that little they read. Because they are lazy, they go after no other sources and they have nobody to ask because everyone in the place seems them as exotic and agressive, violent and noncompliant, on top of nasty, useless and harmful. They still invest on being exactly that, as we saw, the spirit always turned to hell and the mind soaked in satanism, doing the impossible to become the man from satan's year 0, that Nubian asle. Well, they then got stuck on this one more and that was critical, since it would determine the early end of the natural females.

Co-pilot: 'Sure! In German, words that start with "wo-" often form question words or relative pronouns, while their counterparts without "wo-" serve different functions. Here are a couple of examples:

- "Womit" (With what?) vs. "Mit" (With)

- Womit schreibst du? → "With what are you writing?"

- Ich schreibe mit einem Stift. → "I write with a pen."

- "Wofür" (For what?) vs. "Für" (For)

- Wofür interessierst du dich? → "What are you interested in?"

- Ich interessiere mich für Geschichte. → "I am interested in history." In this case, we understand that, if we follow this logic, woman would be 'man what?'

Perplexity: '1. "bei"

Meaning: at, with, by (preposition)

2. "wobei"

Meaning: whereby, in which, during which, at which (relative/interrogative pronoun)

Explanation:

"bei" can be used in sentences like:

Ich bin bei meinem Freund. ("I am at my friend's [place].")

"wobei" can be used in sentences like:

Wobei kann ich dir helfen? ("What can I help you with?" or "Whereby can I help you?")'

Following logic, wo-man could be 'which man?'

We like the last one, seems feminist: which man do you want?

https://www.gymglish.com/en/wunderbla/german-grammar/wo-wohin-or-woher#:~:text=We%20use%20wo%20to%20ask,bist%20du%3F%20%2DIn%20Wien We then understand that wo means where and therefore mann is husband, which is one of the meanings we found for mann somewhere and the female is the man's where or if you want to find a male, ask his wife or his home is with her, wherever she goes or is. See below:

Quote from there: 'We use wo to ask where someone is. We use wohin to ask where someone is going (direction away from the speaker). And we use woher to ask where someone is coming from (direction toward the speaker).

-Wo bist du? -In Wien. -Where are you? -In Vienna.

-Wohin gehst du? -Zum Frisör. -Where are you going? -To the hairdresser's (direction away from the speaker)

-Woher kommst du? -Aus Deutschland. -Where do you come from? -From Germany (direction toward the speaker)'

We find that so romantic! Very Christian! Just like the impression they left in the South of Brazil before the negro satanic men terminated their people and replaced them with their painted oddities.

https://www.quora.com/In-German-how-would-a-woman-say-husband-and-my-husband#:~:text=What%20is%20the%20word%20in,Ein%20Mann%20%2D%20a%20man. confirms that mann in German is husband. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english-german/husband See mann and frau (husband and wife).

Mann is then husband, which became man in English and wo is where: in other words, ‘the place of a man is with his wife’, so that the wife is his ‘where’ or he is always with her.

So, basically, the asle/marginal understood that, for more advanced people, the woman was nobody, a puppet. He wanted to copy those more advanced people and he then came up with the bug and Islam. He thought that his place, in Africa, was underdeveloped because they had the women on top, so those figures, preta velha, pomba and cabocla, on top of the female monarch. More specially, the preta velha really annoyed him. That is why he decided that the man was the person involved, not the woman, so that he had to command all even though he felt that he couldn't and shouldn't. That is then when they decided to invert all there, we now reckon, so in South Sudan. May Our God bless those who do what we ask immediately!