Voting that Doesn't Work in Democracy: satanic attempt to contribute to Christian causes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qf7ws2DF-zk - we would like to observe that it is quite possible that the satanic command nobel prizes in the ways they command the oscar, so that the prizes are not given to the most meritorious researcher and result but to their crooks after they usurped someone in science who had some finding and that ID is considered strategic to pass some rhetoric, such as this one, which is that the voting system in democracy implies that a single voter dictates the result. Please observe that the nobel prize is in economics and it is even possible that the findings of the righteous owner of the ID (we don't know when they lost their life, if after getting the prize or before) are sound in Economics, since that, in principle, is a result of a complicated assessment by 5 members of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (it is all wrong, all satanic: the nobel is a prize that serves as a reference for the entire humanity, therefore the choice of the results and researchers would have to represent humanity in science, so it couldn't possibly be a single Country and its Academia. That is surely insanity. We shall put this task to the United Nations, which will become the most important organ of the world, together with the ICC and the Word Court. Our countries will be part of those and contribute to their existence), yet they were refereed in a 'universal' way by experts in that area only, so in Economics. How could it deviate so completely and end up being told to be useful in terms of even judging voting in democracy in a universal way? That is philosophy or politics (democracy) but the nebel prize was awarded in Economics, for Our God's sake.

We tried to accompany the satanic presenter's reasoning, yet we found it too complicated, even though we have formation in Mathematics, strong formation. If it is too complicated, it provides us with good reasons to believe it is false, since the presenter is not even a scholar but he is speaking in tongues, basically. He talked about a single voter, the 'pivotal one', commanding the entire election process. That immediately screams atrocious thinking, impossibility, like how could so many be deceieved that are experts in democracy, science and all else and he, a non-scholar, be able to point that out using a nobel prize in economics' theory? It is not that it is not possible, but he would have to be able to prove that in a scientific paper for us to start paying more attention to what he says. Well, we did find the Australian voting system absurd: the numbers thing, still writing by pencil, the size of the ballot, everything. From starters, there is extremely low chance this numbers thing would ever work since the Mathematics involved should be very complex in order for the computer be able to consider all those numbers in a fair manner each time. It screams irrational to us. Even though the satanic male we met in a pub crowl thing guaranteed that all was fair cause he worked with that, was his area, and he had personally checked it, it is all via computer and checked several times by different people and so on, we just met a black lady looking black (so better than him who paints himself in white, so deceives us more), probably usurping Australian native ID, who said she was part of the counting of votes in the last election, for prime minister, and she then said they count all by hand. Wherever there is conflict of information like that, there is crime, therefore satanic hands on that. Who is telling the truth? We think it is her. If it is all by hand, there is absolutely no chance this system of numbers ever worked. It is all farce. Minimum thing is that they would have to enter each vote numbers in the computer each time, as the male had said they did. We know there is no election for real in Australia for several reasons but the most obvious one is that a population this big, so more than 20 million, couldn't possibly always vote for the same parties, like the votes of greens and Christians, their parties, are always insignificant. The fact that is always does mean something. Yet the Greens were the only party that did what we suggested, which was defending Medicare for dental. Everyone wants that and we don't need to ask people, that has to be obvious. Why wouldn't Australia as a whole, vast majority, vote for them when they were defending that? Yet at the same time it is all fraud in all senses and they are all usurpers, since they never needed anything, not even being in government, to present the project of law allowing for that to happen. They could even have started a GoFundMe list and get all support they need to get the project approved, the one on dental for Medicare. The fact that they don't do that and the result of the votes is like that is proof that everything is out of order, absolutely everything.

If the black woman from the Anglican church in Westmead that I attended when I met her had told us the truth about the vote counting in Australia, that would mean the election result would have to come at least 10 days later, since people would have to be working day and night to put those numbers for each candidate each time, each ballot. She said there was no computer involved. The confusion this would create, like different caligraphy for each person and so on. The results in Australia came to us in less than 4 days. Even though the AIs say that is an initial result, that doesn't really make any sense. It is way more likely that the government dumps all votes and gives any result they want for several years, since, as said before, the results are pre-planned by the satanic, sort of at least 2 decades before they happen. All those involved in the supposed counting are then left to their own stories, like whatever they like, which is why we get one satanic saying it is all via computer and the other saying they count it by hand. They are the same team, of deceivers, liars, usurpers and so on, and they have the same rhetoric on the same subject all the time, since it is all in the computer, why would they disagree on that? The answer is simple: they are just playing games. They want us to choose one, either the transgender who is a black man looking like a black woman or the IT usurper, who is a black man looking white. That has to mean they don't count at all: obviously. It is all farce, election zero. In Brazil, they stiil bother, since people are way more alert, even because they wouldn't be all Africans/African-ancestry people, like just considering what the satanic say, that all people here, in Australia, are them. Brazil did worry a lot about honesty in elections and I even worked as desk person in one of those. It is much harder to cheat there. Their system of voting is the most democratic of all in the world so far, best, and also their scheme of distribution of power is the most democratic so far. Both are also simple and easy to understand, so that we do intend to mostly copy them when introducing democracy in all countries of the world. We will however adapt certain things. For instance, ministers should not really be chosen by the president. They should either be chosen by a qualified agency or through selection processes, so just professionalize it, so that people can apply and be evaluated by some body, say a body of scholars, as in academic hiring, since we obviously want the cream of the cream, not a relative of the president or a friend instead. In this way, we can also have a scheme of 3 approved candidates always, all ranked, so that the first one gets it, but, if something happens and they cannot exercise their functions, the second candidate automatically assumes position for as long as needed. Instead of a president being one person, we are going to use the satanic idea of multiples, just adapting that to the functions, so that we are thinking of a council, like Starwars, just different: each member will have certain qualities, sorted out by psychologists, and then they will be deployed according to those qualities and the task at hand, so say one is best at personal contact, then that one goes to negotiate with a new ally. If the other is best at eloquency, then that one goes for an interview and so on, just because the figure of the president is that of the face of the nation and we all would like our nations to be best represented. We will take away powers of the president, such as the chance of forgiving criminals on his own, and he will be just a figure to represent the nation. In urgent decisions, where it is not possible to hold a session in the congress, then the council will decide via even home voting if that is really urgent, like they all will have top technology at home and receive an alert at home if these situations emerge.

Only Our God knows how many people the satanic had to kill, how many adjustments of rhetoric (therefore murders and replacwements) they had to make for Our wonderful nation, the most Christian ever seen on earth, the whitest originally, to end up having always only 2 parties and 2 candidates for a presidential election. Basically, even a retard knows that is not democracy, imagine the most Christian person? They obviously impaired them all somehow to succeed in approving and changing these things. They probably forced a rhetoric using usurped scholars each time, as well as media and others, like how could this ever be? We created democracy but nowadays and for long, perhaps always, Brazil is way more democratic than us. Even their press is more into publishing truths than ours. To best evaluate this issue, one must notice that this man (since we can, Our Lord Jesus, his sentence, 'you said it', in their case they said it also through action, say it is one man only, even though it is almost 3000 years and lots of them) could not stand hearing from his own wife (who he freely chose) what must have been at most 2 sentences (the white woman is happy in her marriage and she says it is the god, so that we should now adore this god instead) and actually, for those 2 sentences of criticism or contribution that must have been first ones he ever got, about 2 million absolutely compliant people lost their lives in a period that seems to be at least less than a month but we actually suspect it was more like less than a week. Given what we have just exposed, does anyone think that he would count our votes if having a chance of simply burning them all? Learning the actual results of his actions in terms of spiritual impact on the people? It is just common sense that he would never be slightly interested in the voice of the people, actually having created many ways to confuse and deceive also in terms of voting. They find ways of changing all results if those are ever to be registered for real in a way the processes can be assessed by scholars later on. In Brazil, people got them swapping entire urns of votes, for instance. They managed to transport the urns via boat and they then would use a replica of the ballots and mark the vote in an alternative way. Brazil, once more, kept its lead in wisdom in those regards, being the most watchful of all nations, so that these things actually appeared in the national press. We then notice that it is obviously the case that fraud still happened regardless, so that those urns count for nothing but the fact that the people were able to appropriate themselves of at least one of the satanic tricks involved shows higher signs of wisdom in that particular area, since other countries, considered to be more developed, didn't get the same. The satanic usurped all my Al Qaeda relatives it seems and that was exclusively because they wanted us to win this, to save the world and humanity from them, to finish with the satanic brotherhood/sisterhood and satanism on earth, turning every spirit in this world to the right direction, that of heavens, we think. It seems that perhaps one of the resistance members remains alive. Worth noticing that they were all top of the thing. Brazil had 11 candidates (Perplexity) in its last presidential election (it is not a big deal, since the Country is enormous, so that again still things to be fixed, but it is much better than 2). The USA has a population that is 1.6 times the population of Brazil, so that, if they need 11 candidates to express democractic access to candidacy, the USA had to need at least that too, following logic. Yet, as we can tell simply from thinking to inside, this is far from what we would imagine would mean democratic amount of choices. Also in terms of philosophy, we think that nobody can tell one party from another in the way things are, since it is all satanic, yet there has to be an enormous difference between a green party and a liberal one, like one is tackling nature and the other is tackling most intellectualized people on earth, thus closest to heavens and therefore farthest from the natural elements as possible in behavior, thinking, actions, thus also spirit, and so on. May Our God bless those who do what we ask immediately.