Popular name for Brainwashing: PSYOPs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3AN2wY4qAM, these are Psychological Operations that 'Chase Hugues' explains to us, so common techniques that allow the satanic to puppeteer the victim even without the victim having a 666 in their head or them having physical access to their heads at night (voice to skull). Basically, these techniques make use of exclusively discourse, so that they make use of The Word. He then mentions, for instance, the change in compliance procedures as one of those: that the company would subject the individual to frequent change in compliance requirements so that they would be focused on complying and therefore would be much more likely to accept whatever the other person says without any criticism, so much more likely to internalize their word as if it were a corporeal instruction to the spirit. He also talks about using emotions, so, for instance, showing a negro kid that suffers from neglect, say dirty nose, running, bad clothes, untidy, uncombed hair, no shoes, over a dirty place and so on, completely abandoned, nobody around, and then, after you stop to stare at that kid and you start putting your spirit in alignment with the spirit of that kid to feel what they feel, they say something like, 'do right'. You are then in a state of hypnosis, absorbed by that image, so that those words penetrate your spirit. Another day you are passing and the same person says 'take this material for you to do right', then you are receiving an order already and you will accept that order because it is as if he were the 'voice of Our Lord' inside of you at the moment in which you were in the spiritual world, when it is acceptable that even a top Christian gets confused. He talks about dismissing people's genuine complaint by making those who hear focus on other things that might be universally agreed about that person who is voicing a complaint and that universal thing is a negative, what then makes the person listening reject even listening to the rest of the complaint, like, in their spirit, they are now worthless, less than everyone else, therefore not part of the group that deserves to be listened to. In that direction, we have, for instance, laborers complaining about the fact that their weekly wages cannot cover not even rental in a studio for a week. By the time they are saying 'weekly wages' and the others are listening, someone else, who has a louder or more usual voice, says from behind the listeners that the wife of this man who speaks is at the door and she seems to be saying that he wasted the weekly wage on gambling. People might know that he gambles, they might all have higher salaries and have no idea on how his economical life is, yet they will immediately forget that he started speaking at that height because they now consider him to be a loser, a lesser and others. What usually happens is that the satanic brotherhood then uses that opportunity to murder and replace him, so that next time the same crowd will hear the voice of another thinking it is still his and that voice of the other will say that he has done heaps of the weekly salary, when they all will start listening less to people below them in the wage scale and, with the repetition of such actions, they impose a spiritual rule of now never letting people 'like him' converse with them about those topics again. The dispersion is also observed by us: very rarely this figure of the single heroic reporter shows up in the satanic universe, which is the universe where we live for about 3000 years, and they will say something impactful, even though it will always be little and short, so say they said that the president died (like sometimes they die but, if they don't die in public, the satanic put another usurper in their place so that effectively they didn't die) and you entered shock, just for not knowing anything about what is really happening. You are then now going after news from everywhere else, every other channel, but all other channels will not talk about that, all other reporters, like it was just that one that the satanic missed in terms of control. You will then think that that was some mistake, like you look onine and it seem that the president spoke somewhere still today. That single heroic reporter will get replaced and next day it will be, in your spirit, as if that one was a troublemaker and should never have been heard. He talks about it being bad to portray people as entirely good or entirely bad, say in fairy tales. Yet we would like to observe that real life is really like that, so either the person is entirely good or entirely bad. The good and bad part need to be taught, like the difference between someone who is a Christian and someone who is satanic to any level (so atheist, exu adorer, whatever). Yet, universals are always wrong, unless the universe is something like maths or computers, as we saw before. In this case, there has to be something wrong about portraying people like that, so heroes and vilains: what is wrong is that the negro satnaic man seems to have the impression that if a person is good to another person, say X is the person to whom they are good, they have to be good to them too. The satanic never think that what they think and do, their spiritual orientation, therefore the intentions and thinking that goes with their life and actions on earth is what makes the same person, who was good to another, be bad to them. In this case, even though the book where there is a person who is always good in a certain context, therefore also to a single group of beings or people, is OK and needs to be read, since it is teaching others about human nature and wisdom from heavens, we need to have another book where they show the same character who was seen as good in the previous book being bad to a group of people who is formed of non-compliant/satanic people, so that the human being can grow in wisdom and understand that it is the same person but who changed was the group around them and the difference between the groups is then what is important to be told in clearest way as possible, so little things, such as the other pays attention to what the old mother says all the time, and reflects on all in a socratic way, practicing therefore placid contemplation followed by socratic deepening of reasoning over that, which is already the ways of Christian science, and he starts singing as the old mother speaks to him, not listening for real to a word, so not even listening, who would say doing the rest, which would be a necessity for him to extract wisdom from those moments of interaction with a person who would have to have to what to teach, since, if nothing else, they have been here for longer, like even if it is about facts or people who died. There might be more nuances of the being and all those aspects should be carefully listed by top psychologists so that people who write children's stories, so also cartoons and movies, know what they should be writing and we have to also impose rules so that nothing else is put into our kids' heads apart from what is clearly good and wanted or healthy. We then obviously need the critics to analyze all that each time and if they think something is non-compliant, they have to pass the alert to the governmental organization responsible for all, which, in this particular case, should be the Ministry of the People. The generalization he talks about is yet another type of universalization, so that it has to be part of the story we talked about before, the universals thing of the satanic: that they grab two examples of a group, so say politicians, and generalize, so that if those two have shown that they lie in their discourse, the others all do as well. Yet notice that if those singled out are the best in the pack, the person can indeed generalize, so that if those are the top Christians, and we know that because we see in their Information Agency profile site that they have done several things for the people and their score of reliability is highest, so say people went there in high number, left their identity's mark, and they received 5 stars from 100% of the visitors on that item, meaning those are endorsing their statement, then we can indeed generalize, like if the best in spirit do that, then the rest also does. We have to have in mind that there is absolutely no universals in normal life, so if the universe is the world or humanity. Saying that one cannot ever generalize from 2 or even 1 is a universal. So is saying that having a book where there is a person who always does good and a person who always does bad is unacceptable. Universals, in real life, so outside of what is manufactured by humans, such as computers and maths, are always wrong, as said many times. 'There is only one god for human kind' is not a universal: it is a fact. If we said 'every name ever given to gods is actually a name of Our God', that is a universal and unless we can really list all names ever used and prove each one of them refers to our god, it has to be a false claim. He talks about people using conditionals where the consequent does not fellow from the antecedent, so say, for instance, 'if it rains, the reservoir will be empty'. We then understand that the person who gets brainwashed/spiritually manipulated by that is someone who is used to internalize anything in the shape used by Mathematics, 'if...then', without criticizing the parts that form the if..then. That particular person did not have a good Mathematics teacher, we infer. The 'everyone thinks like that' is something we saw the satanic using with frequency to pass rhetoric. It is then necessary to set up a spiritual alarm so that our mind gets shaken at those moments and can then present the right argumentation as to why that is not true. Any claim of that type, 'everyone', or all, should also be false, since all groups, even of animals, are formed of individuals, like the ants, for instance, if you have ever observed them, some of them don't follow the line and go over the others and stuff, so even those who have no soul, whose kind was not selected for the path to heavens...The satanic themselves - that was 'Nelson' - came up with another basic example: everyone says that (not sure about the animal being this but it was definitely a bird of some type) chicks peep, yet 'Nelson' reports (in a joke) that this particular group of 3 chicks had one that was mute. If there is one thing we could never imagine before he said that was that a chick could be mute, like we never imagined any animal who could suffer from our disgraces, basically. We then learned also that, on top of laughing about the joke (it was like this: three chicks were crossing the abandoned road. Peep, peep. Then most of us must ask and we think we did: what about the third one? Then he goes: the third one was mute!!! This is just to show that the assumptions of ours, even being who we are in terms of proximity to heavens, are really poor, like not only do we assume it is one peep for each but we also assume that all three have to do the same and, if not, they all must still have the capability of doing the same. It looks like nothing, but stories like this are actually what teach observation skills to kids (also adults!), like those are some of the skills we need to practice (true) placid contemplation or to remain on the heavens' path. It is obviously for observing things in such a way that the Preta Velha was always considered to be the voice to be heard in their South Sudan of life before they (the satanic) attack, murder, usurp and take over. May Our God bless those who do what we ask immediately.