Rudyard Kipling

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudyard_Kipling - Rudyard is 'rud'+'yard' and Kipling is 'kip'+'ling'. Rud is Irish for object or thing (Co-pilot). Yard as in English. Kip is sleep or nap in British slang (Co-pilot). That is then an Al Qaeda name, which means it is an ID created by the satanic brotherhood for the purposes of perpetrating against humanity and this world, oh well, also against Our God, Our Lord and heavens plus Our People. They then say this ID belongs to someone born in British India, which must mean they get the ID through some scheme of the government, where the key positions have been usurped by them, if not all. They did that because nobody has ever heard of an admirable poem coming from Indians or blacks. All those with us should be able to tell why. It is then all satanic, as said.

Notice that the 'spirit that sleeps in a yard of things' can only be that of a dead person. They cannot share our world reference for spirit, for otherwise they would be Christians, so that they have to believe in a spirit that is formed only of matter that humans are able to tell is matter, with current science. The satanic now put the image of 'Braganca'/the devil sleeping in a bedroom full of things, as we once saw him at Marques de Valenca, 16/404 Tijuca, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, where we lived with him at that height (just for a few days). He had many paper bags full of stuff from the cars whose drivers and passengers he had murdered (not sure what he does with the corpses, but 'Nelson' probably collects those when he finishes back then). His mattress was on the floor, so that anyone entering the room would not see him when he was lying down. 'Lea Maria', on that particular occasion, came to give him some love, when he kissed 'her' in the mouth in front of us for the very first and only time. That was in the living room, when I was standing and conversing with her as he arrived from the street. The message the satanic intended is that he (since they see themselves as one, that man, from the beginning, the Nubian husband, as explained) is now owner of all objects/things, when he is ready for the next stage. 'Braganca'/the devil confirms this interpretation. We put the vision of 'Braganca'/the devil at Marques together with our understanding of their notion of spirit and we get a dead being, devoid of all humanity, a thing like the rest of the yard. Actually less than a dead human being then, and once more. In perfect agreement with the idea we cast, which is that he is a thing, less than animals and vegetables too. He then appropriated himself of all objects to the point of becoming one of them in a yard, when he still has company, but now everyone is like him, so an object, a thing too, which probably points at an end in which he will be with AIs, not people, having already existed like that, changing us all into AIs, during the term of his spiritual existence on earth. Perhaps it has to do with them actually knowing that they became the spirit of that man from Nubia, the husband from Moses' time, and then realizing, at this height, that that is a thing, not an actual spirit, so that it is all things, since they destroyed humanity, all gone, like there are human beings around, still plenty, yet they are devoid of all humanity.

'Braganca'/the devil thought that their people could not hear things that make sense, since otherwise they would leave the 'dark movement', like they would feel how different things were. If said like that, they would not feel anything, which means they would not wish for changing.

IF (https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/46473/if---)

'If you can keep your head when all about you

Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,

If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,

But make allowance for their doubting too;

If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,

Or being lied about, don’t deal in lies,

Or being hated, don’t give way to hating,

And yet don’t look too good, nor talk too wise:

If you can dream—and not make dreams your master;

If you can think—and not make thoughts your aim;

If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster

And treat those two impostors just the same;

If you can bear to hear the truth you’ve spoken

Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,

Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken,

And stoop and build ’em up with worn-out tools:

If you can make one heap of all your winnings

And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss,

And lose, and start again at your beginnings

And never breathe a word about your loss;

If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew

To serve your turn long after they are gone,

And so hold on when there is nothing in you

Except the Will which says to them: ‘Hold on!’

If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,

Or walk with Kings—nor lose the common touch,

If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you,

If all men count with you, but none too much;

If you can fill the unforgiving minute

With sixty seconds’ worth of distance run,

Yours is the Earth and everything that’s in it,

And—which is more—you’ll be a Man, my son!'

The paragraph about the winnings: it talks about not dealing with your loss in a way to learn from it: that it should simply be ignored, nothing to reflect upon. That is definitely what they do, like they never stop to think about things when they lose an argument, for instance. They say they start again, so that the pick another topic and try to win on that one, that is obviously what they think: that it is all about winning or losing instead of that being just part of something much greater, which is the process of acquiring heavens' wisdom through our interactions, so being able to, with no mistake, identify exactly where we failed in our reasoning and fix it in order to more perfectly align reasoning with that of heavens'.

'If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew

To serve your turn long after they are gone,

And so hold on when there is nothing in you

Except the Will which says to them: ‘Hold on!’

Notice that they think we can make our body parts serve our biography long after they disappear from earth (?). He advises himself (since it is all about one person, a male) to hold on where there is nothing in him, so that he is a completely empty person but he must still live, and the only thing he has inside of him, thus in his spirit, is the will of telling others to remain alive, so exactly like a ressurected person, he exists as such. No, we say: he shouldn't hold on to life if he is happy being like that, not at all. Please kill yourself. We, Twins of God, are absolutely in favor of abortion, euthanasia and assisted suicide for absolutely everyone. Our Lord Jesus is in favor of maximum freedom, speciallyfor women, within the boundaries of the 5 principles and the democratic laws that have been either supported or chosen by the people of the nations. This 'he' had obligation of asking to be killed or killing himself. A man who is wrong and does not want to change is a pest, a cancer in our bodies, and everyone knows that is literally the case. Notice that the biography and the he they refer to can only be the first one, the Nubian husband. It could be satan but, in that case, all of them, so all members of the satanic brotherhood and sisterhood would equate satan's presence on earth and the biography would be that of the institution or satanic brotherhood/sisterhood, and the problem with all that is that the poem says 'you', which clearly refers to a single person who is reading, therefore each individual. In that case, they have to be referring to the material spirit they created and become of this single initial man, who committed the original sin, which was obviously not accepting the spiritual directions given to him by his wife when he had nothing better to go with, given that she was talking about life results, so happy couple, and she was referring to the fact that no blacks she ever had contact with were that happy as a couple. The negro satanic man inverts absolutely everything and is confused, as any man without a woman should be: he then puts the heavens' wisdom to the fruit but blames the genitalia for the punishment received from Our God. If the problem were eating something, do we eat with the genitalia? He is all confusion and trouble without his natural woman, clearly the case. He also transferred the source of heavens' wisdom from the woman to the fruit, so that his first move was passing rhetoric in that direction: his woman was now the same as a fruit, which everyone knows they eat and is over in full, physically eat, so that it is even possible this man cannibalized his wife, and the feminine figure without wisdom, so the prostitute, became the one who makes him sin, so makes him physically eat the wife, that then being what leads to them having to get out of paradise. We now realized that 'Braganca'/the devil perhaps lied to us regarding the story of the Nubian husband, since he must then have first found a woman in Arabia that he wanted to be with to only then get the wife killed. According to 'Braganca'/the devil, she then gets killed from being selected to give her life for the people in the human sacrifice thing, so through the Amen's Wife, who is now the negro satanic man dressed as a woman, since they murdered and usurped her too. Yet, we now imagine he himself killed her and then ate, just because of the creation story that the satanic like and preserved. Here we must remember that it was him who chose her, like one-sided thing, according to the own 'Braganca'/the devil. Leaving paradise may as well be leaving Egypt, like the guy who stole the monograph loved Egypt and wanted to go back home at any expense. We think we are sure the brewery thing that 'Braganca'/the devil mentions when reporting on how to the word 'He-brew' appeared was created/put there, in Egypt, by the negro satanic man after they killed and usurped everyone at the top.

In this case, the negro satanic man does not mind spending his life without a name and having his acts registered in the biography of the first man, their Adam (who knows maybe even actually called Adam). We then made sense of that by remembering some things that characterize their culture: he calls his wife 'mulher' in Brazil, so not by means of her name. He calls man 'cara', 'garoto', 'bixo', etc., so again not by his name. He calls his kids 'garoto', 'filho', etc. In this way, they get used to not be a proper person and are brainwashed with the idea that they are all nobody, fully replaceable, like if you say 'woman'/mulher, all that is meant is a woman, therefore any woman will do, finally even a transgender, so someone who looks like one. They then see life as a web of relationships, so that people are their functions, say 'mother', 'father', 'son', 'manager' and so on. Because of that, they can easily mix and match, swap and all else, we now think. In this way, they don't think of giving a gift to me, the Elsie from the Twins of God, when they do that, they think of simply 'giving a gift to someone close', which then explains why almost all their gifts are items that don't please me and Our God knows 'Antonia', for instance, had the courage of giving me food from the cariocas, made by them, but packed as if it were professional packaging, still full of refined sugar, when I don't eat that, telling me that was her gift and it didn't have sugar. I don't eat refined sugar, following the token from 'Nelson' and what I learned from him and later on confirmed online. That could have been poison and I could have eaten it just for trusting 'she' was my good friend, the first person I spoke to at St Paul's. She was obviously 'giving me something', so 'a gift to someone close to her'. It could be that people, at this stage, would say that is just with me, yet 'Hermolga', for instance, used to give second-hand clothes, that she had previously worn, to 'Lea Maria'. She had money because of 'her' 'husband'. Those were two from the same bunch, right? May Our God bless those who do what we ask immediately.